In September, New York Police Department Commissioner Raymond Kelly explained that, after 9/11, “I knew we needed to buttress our defenses of the city. We couldn’t rely on the federal government alone. I believed that we had to create our … own counter terrorism division.” And so he did. The effort now employs 1,000 officers and in the last decade has cost $3 billion—about the GDP of Fiji. Kelly built himself a $150 million movie-set control room, filled with feeds from thousands of cameras set up around New York and a brigade of spectacularly armed soldier-cops. From there, he commands an anti-terror infrastructure that outsizes numerous federal agencies. New York became a fortress.
Little wonder that this massive military-style bureaucracy has proven unwilling and unable to be accountable to the public it serves.
In recent months, news reports have revealed NYPD program’s to surveil, spy on and infiltrate Muslim communities across the northeastern United States. Kelly’s agents have attached cameras to telephone polls outside of mosques and catalogued the license plate numbers of everyone who enters for prayer. The cops spied on Muslim student groups on 16 college campuses in New York, Connecticut, New Jersey and Pennsylvania and created a database of every Muslim owned business in the greater New York Area; Gawker referred to the documents, released by the Associated Press, as a “Zagat Guide to Newark’s Best…Muslim Restaurants.”
Kelly and his spokesperson Paul Browne have claimed over and over again that the cops only follow legitimate leads and that their activities do not amount to religious or racial profiling. All evidence is to the contrary. And with each new detail that AP unearths, the evidence of religious and racial profiling mounts. In one document, released by the AP, the NYPD went so far as to take note of a small African American Muslim preschool in Newark.
Much of the money to fund this spying program came from the federal government.
On Monday, the AP reported that the program to map the location of Muslims and surveil them, J. Edger Hoover-style, also drew directly on federal funding, in the form of a grant direct from the White House.
Since September 11, 2001, AP reported, the “Bush and Obama administrations have provided $135 million to the New York and New Jersey region through the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area program, known as HIDTA.” Neither the White House nor Congress are given details of how the money is spent. But the AP reports the drug war-era funds have been used at least in some part to pay for “cars that plainclothes NYPD officers used to conduct surveillance on Muslim neighborhoods and … for computers that stored” information of the targets of the NYPD’s Muslim mapping program.
The ACLU and other groups have demanded a federal probe into the legality the spending.
“We’re concerned that federal resources may be used to map Muslims with no evidence of wrongdoing,” said Nusrat Choudhury, an attorney with the ACLU’s National Security Project. “There are federal protections against this and what disturbs is that there’s a revelation that the White House may have supported it.”
But the White House money came in addition to a much larger pool of funds from the federal government. According to New York City documents, nearly $1 billion came to the NYPD directly from the Department of Homeland Security in just the last seven years to pay, in part, for the sprawling anti-terrorism program.
And to pay the salaries of its officers scattered around the world—Tel Aviv, Istanbul, Amman, Toronto, etc…—NYPD draws from private money. The New York Police Foundation, a privately funded independent entity set up to support the NYPD, pays for the department’s International Liaison Program. These officers gallop around the globe unwatched, with no oversight by Congress or any other federal entity, acting in the name of New York City residents.
Liza Goitein is co-director of the National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice in New York. “This is the front line of counter terrorism today and yet very little is known in terms of what local cops are doing,” she said. “The NYPD has become a its own little FBI. But then you contrast the oversight of FBI, which is overseen by congress, and has an internal inspector general. There is nothing like that in the NYPD.”
A Closer Look at Kelly’s Claims
The billions of dollars in public and private money pumped into the department has created an infrastructure that resembles Hollywood. Indeed, in a September interview with 60 Minutes, Kelly told a story to a smitten Scott Pelley about how he hoped his anti-terrorism machine would deter terrorists. “If you see the movie Casablanca and you have Humphrey Bogart talking to Col. Strasser,” said Kelly, “and he says that he would advise the Nazis to think twice about invading certain parts of New York City, that’s our message: stay away.”
Since September 11, only one reported act of terrorism has been carried out to its end in New York City. A man named Faisal Shahzad drove his Nissan S.U.V. into Times Square with explosives in the back and lit a fuse. The car smoked, but nothing exploded and nobody was hurt. In that case, Kelly says, “we were lucky.” In his filmic view, the army he’s built has kept the city safe from other attacks by building its massive infrastructure to spy on Muslim American restaurants and college students.
“There have been 13 plots against New York that have been thwarted by either the great work of our federal partners, NYPD officers, just plain luck, or a combination of all three,” Kelly wrote in an August piece for the NY Daily News, before the most recent crop of AP revelations. He’s since added a 14th foiled plot to this list.
NYPD has provided very little information about the plots on Kelly’s list, but Colorlines.com dug through old new reports to try and figure out what he was talking about.
What’s notable is that none of the cases we identified were prevented by the city’s program of indiscriminate spying on Muslims. The NYPD’s widespread racial and religious profiling program, from this view, has done nothing to keep the city safer. It would be troubling even if it were effective, to be sure, but Kelly’s core argument for unchecked authority to surveil doesn’t appear to hold up, when measured against the list of accomplishments he cites.
Moreover, that very program may in fact have helped create a handful of the plots that the NYPD claims to have foiled.
Kelly attributed the department’s undoing of the Times Square bombing attempt to luck. Of the 13 other plots, at least five appear to have involved the use of informants—cops who infiltrate communities and pretend to have connections to terrorist organizations. As has been widely reported at this point, those informants systematically target young, economically strapped, often disgruntled and sometimes mentally ill men and push them to participate in plans to attack New York. The plots exist only because NYPD, or in some cases the FBI, have made them up and recruited the young men to participate, often in the most vague ways. But once the young men agree, the cops pounce, charge the men with conspiracy, send them away to several decades in jail and hold a press conference announcing our narrow escape from danger.
In at least two of these informant-led cases, the practices were so concerning that even the FBI—which usually handles terrorism cases and has itself engaged in behavior that amounts to entrapment—refused to prosecute.
In the most recent case—the 14th plot on Kelly’s list—Jose Pimentel, a young New Yorker described by people who knew him as “unstable,” is accused of building a bomb to explode in the city. Pimentel was indicted on terrorism charges yesterday. If convicted, he could spend the rest of his life in jail.
The New York Times reports that Pimental used the NYPD informant’s apartment to build a bomb. The NYPD “informer provided companionship and a staging area so Mr. Pimentel, a Muslim convert, could build three pipe bombs while the Intelligence Division of the New York Police Department built its case” against him.
According to the Times, “the informer’s role, and that of his police handlers…have now been cited as among the reasons the F.B.I., which had its own parallel investigation of Mr. Pimentel, did not pursue the case.” Two sources told the Times that federal “investigators were concerned that the case raised some entrapment questions.”
The FBI similarly refused to participate in another investigation of two young men convicted recentely of lesser charges. Mohamed Mamdouh and Ahmed Ferhani were targeted by a police informant and the FBI expressed concerns about entrapment. A law enforcement official told The Associated Press that “the FBI had reservations about how the probe was conducted and concluded the allegations weren’t worthy of a federal terrorism case.”
Another plot listed by Kelly is that of Shahawar Martin Siraj and James Elshafay, which Colorlines.com covered previously. The two men were convicted of 2004 charges to detonate a bomb in New York’s Herald Square. The plot never existed before NYPD informants were involved in the case.
Despite its rejection of entrapment tactics in several NYPD cases, the FBI has used informants as well. According to a 2010 investigation by “Democracy Now!,” an FBI informant allegedly entrapped four black Muslim men from a poor neighborhood in Newburgh, N.Y., convincing them to participate in a fake attack on a synagogue. Federal prosecutors argue that their participation in the plot proves that they were predisposed to terrorism. But the defense contends that the men would never have committed any act of violence were it not for the FBI’s fabrication of a plot and its concerted campaign to convince them to join it. The case is on Kelly’s list as well.
In a fifth case where informants may have been used, Najibullah Zazi drove from Denver toward New York City in 2009 in a car reportedly filled with explosives. Unlike the other four, the Zazi case may have developed independently from the informants involvement, but it appears to be federal investigators, not the NYPD, that thwarted the plan. On his way to New York, Zazi received a tip that the FBI was watching him and he turned his car around. The FBI soon arrested the man.
None of the remaining eight plots appear to involve the NYPD in substantive ways. Rather, they’re mostly a list of reported plots to attack the city drawn from the federal government’s global war on terrorism. Several of the plots, none of which were acted upon, were gleaned from interrogations of men detained in Guantanamo Bay.
One involved a reported plan by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to attack the Brooklyn Bridge. The plan was reportedly called off by Al Qaeda after an operative “found that security at the bridge made it too difficult to attack,” wrote Kelly. There’s no reported evidence that the NYPD was involved in foiling the alleged plot.
Similarly, a reported “December 2002 plot to disperse cyanide gas in the subway system … was called off at the last minute,” according to Kelly. Again, there was no reported evidence that the NYPD was involved in foiling the plot.
In a 2004 plot to blow up corporate headquarters in New York and New Jersey—which was covered at length by the press but about which there remains very little public information—according to the AP at the time, the plot was gleaned “from Pakistan’s capture of an al-Qaeda operative several weeks ago, a U.S. counterterrorism official said, speaking only anonymously.”
An Al Qaeda plot to smuggle explosives into Manhattan that was apparently concocted by Saifullah Paracha, an alleged Al Qaeda operative, was gleaned from interrogations of Paracha in the Guantanamo Bay prison.
The list goes on: A plot thought up and apparently foiled in England; a plot that never made it out of Afghanistan; a plot to attack JFK Airport that was investigated and prosecuted by the FBI; a plot gleaned from federal surveillance of chats and web exchange between people not in the United States. None of it suggests NYPD’s widespread and indiscriminate surveillance of Muslim Americans serves an urgent public purpose.
The question is not whether the federal government and even the NYPD should be engaged in anti-terrorism work. There have surely been real plots to attack the New York since 9/11. The question is what kind of work the NYPD is doing, with what oversight and to what ends.
The NYPD has succeeded in incarcerating a small group of cash strapped, sometimes mentally ill young men who never intended to commit acts of terrorism before the NYPD informants devised the plan. In these cases, the city for all intents and purposes built fantasy bombs and attached to them ticking clocks, handed the fakes to troubled and confused men and then arrested the men as terrorists.
The city’s broader practices of spying, surveillance and mapping based on religion and race raise fundamental concerns about civil rights and constitutional violations that precede questions about whether the practices indeed keep the city safer. For the Muslim Americans who have been spied on, the program has not brought safety. Last week, a Columbia University student who is a member of the Muslim Student Association there told Colorlines.com, “I’ve spent the last four days rethinking every single interaction I’ve had here. Everything I’ve said in Middle East Studies class … in the cafeteria.”
The spying and use of informants, the convictions and the lists, all serve a function that’s less tangible, but for Kelly just as necessary: justifying his infrastrucrture. Indeed, as long as Kelly can demonstrate a homegrown threat, he’s got fodder to defend his spying and infiltration—and the billions of dollars and unchecked authority he wields. It’s a program that has expanded his own reach and the institutional power of the NYPD beyond precedent and struck fear into communities without any demonstrable benefit to public safety.